Volume 20, Issue 2 (2024)
ioh 2024, 20(2): 201-218 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: ۹۸۱۱۹۰۵۰۰۳
Ethics code: IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1401.138
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kouhnavard B, Mazlomi A, Shamsipour - M. Identification of effective factors in musculoskeletal disorders of tea harvesting workers: a qualitative study. ioh 2024; 20 (2) :201-218
URL: http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3547-en.html
URL: http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3547-en.html
- , bahramk2011@gmail.com
Abstract: (1158 Views)
Background and aims: Work-related musculoskeletal disorder is a multifactorial complication that leads to a loss of work time, inability, and increased economic cost. The aim of this study was to identify the factors affecting the musculoskeletal disorders of tea harvesting workers.
Method: The current descriptive-qualitative research was conducted with directed content analysis where in 14 participating tea pluckers were selected through purposive and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected by semi-structured interview method and were then analyzed in MAXQDA12 software. In this study, Carayon’s SEIPS model was used as a predetermined framework for the macroergonomics approach.
Results: The numbers of 214 primary codes, 56 important codes, 17 subcategories, and 5 main categories (i.e., individual, task-related, tools and technologies, environment-related factors and organizational) were obtained as the effective factors in musculoskeletal disorders among tea harvesting workers in the results of continuous analysis. Important codes extracted from the interview in the individual category including (age, gender, previous work experience in tea plucking, feeling very tired, etc.), task-related category (improper posture, exerting force on trunk and hand, etc.), the category of tools and equipment (the long length of the bag attached to the hand tool for picking tea, etc.), the category related to environmental factors (surfaces uphill and downhill), the height of the tea plant (short and tall), the type of tea harvesting area (plains and mountains, etc.) and organizational category (lack of sufficient training on the correct way of doing work, lack of support and support from the employer and threat of dismissal (lack of job security) and...).
Conclusion: Considering that agricultural jobs (especially tea harvesting) have diversity in the nature of tasks compared to industrial tasks, among the different factors on musculoskeletal disorders in this job, it can be attributed to the greater activity of women in this job due to the need for High physical activity, manual handling of tea bags (60 to 80 kg), using traditional hand tools, humidity and temperature of the working environment (working outdoors in the summer season and under rain), working environment (height of the tea plant, limited access to all tea plant space), the uneven surface of the ground during activity, applying force on the hand (crossing movements of hand tools while working), not establishing a shift work system and working hours over 12 hours. In order to prevent these disorders, a multi-faceted approach of actions from these factors is needed, which can be ergonomic redesign of tea growers' work tools, improvement of tea plants and work space, training of ergonomic principles of body posture and load handling, creating insurance coverage and Other related cases were mentioned in this study.
Method: The current descriptive-qualitative research was conducted with directed content analysis where in 14 participating tea pluckers were selected through purposive and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected by semi-structured interview method and were then analyzed in MAXQDA12 software. In this study, Carayon’s SEIPS model was used as a predetermined framework for the macroergonomics approach.
Results: The numbers of 214 primary codes, 56 important codes, 17 subcategories, and 5 main categories (i.e., individual, task-related, tools and technologies, environment-related factors and organizational) were obtained as the effective factors in musculoskeletal disorders among tea harvesting workers in the results of continuous analysis. Important codes extracted from the interview in the individual category including (age, gender, previous work experience in tea plucking, feeling very tired, etc.), task-related category (improper posture, exerting force on trunk and hand, etc.), the category of tools and equipment (the long length of the bag attached to the hand tool for picking tea, etc.), the category related to environmental factors (surfaces uphill and downhill), the height of the tea plant (short and tall), the type of tea harvesting area (plains and mountains, etc.) and organizational category (lack of sufficient training on the correct way of doing work, lack of support and support from the employer and threat of dismissal (lack of job security) and...).
Conclusion: Considering that agricultural jobs (especially tea harvesting) have diversity in the nature of tasks compared to industrial tasks, among the different factors on musculoskeletal disorders in this job, it can be attributed to the greater activity of women in this job due to the need for High physical activity, manual handling of tea bags (60 to 80 kg), using traditional hand tools, humidity and temperature of the working environment (working outdoors in the summer season and under rain), working environment (height of the tea plant, limited access to all tea plant space), the uneven surface of the ground during activity, applying force on the hand (crossing movements of hand tools while working), not establishing a shift work system and working hours over 12 hours. In order to prevent these disorders, a multi-faceted approach of actions from these factors is needed, which can be ergonomic redesign of tea growers' work tools, improvement of tea plants and work space, training of ergonomic principles of body posture and load handling, creating insurance coverage and Other related cases were mentioned in this study.
Keywords: Tea Harvesting, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Qualitative Study, SEIPS model, Macroergonomics
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Ergonomics
Received: 2023/08/11 | Accepted: 2023/11/12 | Published: 2023/12/31
Received: 2023/08/11 | Accepted: 2023/11/12 | Published: 2023/12/31
References
1. Hassani M, Hesampour R, Bartnicka J, Monjezi N, Ezbarami SM. Evaluation of working conditions, work postures, musculoskeletal disorders and low back pain among sugar production workers. Work. 2022;73(1):273-89. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-210873]
2. Barneo-Alcántara M, Díaz-Pérez M, Gómez-Galán M, Carreño-Ortega Á, Callejón-Ferre Á-J. Musculoskeletal Disorders in Agriculture: A Review from Web of Science Core Collection. Agronomy. 2021;11(10):2017. [DOI:10.3390/agronomy11102017]
3. Kee D, Haslam R. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in agriculture workers in Korea and preventative interventions. Work. 2019;64(4):763-75. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-193038]
4. Occhipinti E, Colombini D. A toolkit for the analysis of biomechanical overload and prevention of WMSDs: Criteria, procedures and tool selection in a step-by-step approach. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2016;52:18-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.08.001]
5. Tayyarim F, Smith J. Occupational ergonomics: principles and applications. 1997th ed ed. New York, NY: Springer; 1997.
6. Chandrasekara UHS, Warnakulasuriya SSP, Kisokanth G. Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and environmental health hazards among tea pluckers of Maddekanda tea estate in Balangoda Pradeshiya Saba Division, Sri Lanka. J Public Health Res. 2020;9(4):1796. [DOI:10.4081/jphr.2020.1796]
7. Dewangan K, Dihingia P. Musculoskeletal symptoms among tea pluckers in India. Occupational Ergonomics. 2011;10:69-81. [DOI:10.3233/OER-2012-0193]
8. Abdul Hadi H. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain among tea plantation workers in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2016;13(1):10-1.
9. Masri N, Deros BM, Mohd Yusoff H. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among tea pluckers. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2017:221 - 32.
10. Javidi Gharache M, Khojastehpour M. Ergonomic evaluation of tea farmers in north of Iran during plucking using body modeling. Journal of Agricultural Machinery. 2016;6(2):488- 98.
11. Joshi M, Deshpande V. A systematic review of comparative studies on ergonomic assessment techniques. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2019;74:102865. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102865]
12. Marak TR, Bhagat D, Borah S. Musculoskeletal disorders of garo women workers engaged in tea-plucking activity: an ergonomic analysis. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2020;24(2):60. [DOI:10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_185_19]
13. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation: Sage; 1989.
14. Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM. Macroergonomics: Theory, methods, and applications: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002. [DOI:10.1201/b12477]
15. Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, Alvarado CJ, Smith M, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-8. [DOI:10.1136/qshc.2005.015842]
16. Odberg KR, Hansen BS, Aase K, Wangensteen S. A work system analysis of the medication administration process in a Norwegian nursing home ward. Appl Ergon. 2020;86:103100. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103100]
17. Danesh M, Garosi E, Mazloumi A, Najafi S. Identifying factors influencing cardiac care nurses' work ability within the framework of system engineering initiative for patient safety. Work. 2020;66:1-9. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-203199]
18. Asilian-Mahabadi H, Khosravi Y, Hassanzadeh-Rangi N, Hajizadeh E, Behzadan AH. Factors affecting unsafe behavior in construction projects: development and validation of a new questionnaire. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(2):219-26. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2017.1408243]
19. Khosravi Y, Asilian-Mahabadi H, Hajizadeh E, Hassanzadeh-Rangi N, Bastani H, Behzadan AH. Factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents on construction sites: a review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(1):111-25. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2014.11077023]
20. Jameel B, Shaheen S, Majid U. Introduction to qualitative research for novice investigators. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology Journal. 2018;2:1-6. [DOI:10.26685/urncst.57]
21. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research. 2005;15(9):1277-88. [DOI:10.1177/1049732305276687]
22. Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Pilotta J. Naturalistic inquiry california. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. [DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8]
23. Sombatsawat E, Luangwilai T, Ong-artborirak P, Siriwong W. Musculoskeletal disorders among rice farmers in Phimai district, Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. Journal of Health Research. 2019;33(6):494-503. [DOI:10.1108/JHR-01-2019-0009]
24. Osborne A, Blake C, Meredith D, Kinsella A, Phelan J, McNamara J, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Irish farm operators. Am J Ind Med. 2013;56(2):235-42. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.22092]
25. Mallahi N, Kalteh HO, Amouzadeh E, Yazdani Cherati J, Etemadinezhad S. Investigating the Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Related Factors in Paddy Farmers. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2021;31(200):81-9.
26. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):646-56.
27. Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT. Musculoskeletal disorders in farmers and farm workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2002;52(8):441-50. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/52.8.441]
28. Langat CK, Bii C, Opondo E, Mbakaya C. Occupational risk factors of low back pain among tea pickers and non-tea pickers in James Finlay (K) Ltd, Kericho County, Kenya. J Biol Agric Healthcare. 2015;5:26491.
29. Songsaeng W, Siriwong W. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among coffee harvesters in Chiang Rai, Thailand: Prevalence, severity, and risk factors. J Health Res. 2018;32:S112-S20.
30. Milhem M, Kalichman L, Ezra D, Alperovitch-Najenson D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: A comprehensive narrative review. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(5):735-47. [DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00620]
31. Kaewdok T, Sirisawasd S, Taptagaporn S. Agricultural Risk Factors Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Older Farmers in Pathum Thani Province, Thailand. J Agromedicine. 2021;26(2):185-92. [DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2020.1795029]
32. Magnavita N, Elovainio M, De Nardis I, Heponiemi T, Bergamaschi A. Environmental discomfort and musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational medicine. 2011;61(3):196-201. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqr024]
33. Shin G, Mirka G. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting. Ergonomics. 2004;47(6):646-59. [DOI:10.1080/00140130310001653066]
34. Zhao Y, Upadhyaya S, Kaminaka M. Foot-ground forces on sloping ground when lifting∗. Ergonomics. 1987;30(12):1671-87. [DOI:10.1080/00140138708966057]
35. 35 Das B. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in agriculture: Ergonomics risk assessment and its prevention among Indian farmers. Work. 2023. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-220246]
36. Jaffar NAT, Rahman MNA, editors. Review on risk factors related to lower back disorders at workplace. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2017: IOP Publishing. [DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012035]
37. Lee JG, Kim GH, Jung SW, Kim SW, Lee JH, Lee KJ. The association between long working hours and work-related musculoskeletal symptoms of Korean wage workers: data from the fourth Korean working conditions survey (a cross-sectional study). Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018;30:67. [DOI:10.1186/s40557-018-0278-0]
38. Menzel NN. Psychosocial factors in musculoskeletal disorders. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2007;19(2):145-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2007.02.006]
39. Das B. Ergonomic and psychosocial risk factors for low back pain among rice farmers in West Bengal, India. Work. 2022;72(3):967-77. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-210433]
40. Colin J. MacKay, Rosanna Cousins, Peter J. Kelly, Steve Lee & Ron H. McCaig.'Management Standards' and work-related stress in the UK: policy background and science.Work & Stress.2004; 18(2), 91-112. [DOI:10.1080/02678370410001727474]
41. Mokarami H, Cousins R, Choobineh A. Understanding job stress in The Iranian oil industry: A qualitative analysis based on the work systems model and macroergonomics approach. Appl Ergon. 2021 Jul;94:103407. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103407]
42. Kalteh HO, Mokarami H. A macroergonomics perspective for exploring safety culture factors: a qualitative content analysis approach. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2227-2237. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2021.1996070]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
