Volume 20, Issue 2 (2024)
ioh 2024, 20(2): 17-29 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Vosoughi S, Mesripour N, Alimohammadi I, Abolghasemi J. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF USING AEROGEL ON TRANSMISSION LOSS OF EARMUFF. ioh 2024; 20 (2) :17-29
URL: http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3351-en.html
URL: http://ioh.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3351-en.html
Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , nilo.mrs@gmail.com
Abstract: (974 Views)
INTRODUCTION: Noise is one of the harmful factors in workplaces. The most important effect of long-term exposure to it is hearing loss and its impact on the human auditory system. This effect is understandable despite its irreversible and permanent nature. One of the easiest ways to use this adverse effect is earmuffs. Nowadays, earmuffs are used with different sound insulation. Moreover, aerogels are acoustic and thermal insulators and can be a suitable alternative to the currently used compounds.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three models of Iranian, Taiwanese, and American earmuffs were assembled with two models of aerogel (thickness of 5 mm and density of 120 kg/m3 as four layers and thickness of 10 mm and density of 140 kg/m3 as two layers). The noise reduction of the assembled earmuffs was investigated using an acoustic head mannequin.
RESULTS: The obtained results showed that the acoustic properties of the earmuffs assembled with aerogel pads have been improved compared to before, and this difference is significant in Iranian earmuffs. The highest reduction was observed at the frequency of 8000 Hz, which was 34.5, 42, and 47.9 dB for the two-layer assembly and 33.5, 43.1, and 46.7 for the four-layer assembly in Iranian, Taiwanese, and American earmuffs. It was also found that double-layer aerogel pads performed better than four-layer pads.
CONCLUSION: Assembling earmuffs with aerogel pads can significantly improve acoustic performance and increase the amount of noise reduction in earmuffs. Of course, using the maximum amount of sound reduction requires sufficient monitoring of their correct use and the necessary training for their regular use.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three models of Iranian, Taiwanese, and American earmuffs were assembled with two models of aerogel (thickness of 5 mm and density of 120 kg/m3 as four layers and thickness of 10 mm and density of 140 kg/m3 as two layers). The noise reduction of the assembled earmuffs was investigated using an acoustic head mannequin.
RESULTS: The obtained results showed that the acoustic properties of the earmuffs assembled with aerogel pads have been improved compared to before, and this difference is significant in Iranian earmuffs. The highest reduction was observed at the frequency of 8000 Hz, which was 34.5, 42, and 47.9 dB for the two-layer assembly and 33.5, 43.1, and 46.7 for the four-layer assembly in Iranian, Taiwanese, and American earmuffs. It was also found that double-layer aerogel pads performed better than four-layer pads.
CONCLUSION: Assembling earmuffs with aerogel pads can significantly improve acoustic performance and increase the amount of noise reduction in earmuffs. Of course, using the maximum amount of sound reduction requires sufficient monitoring of their correct use and the necessary training for their regular use.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Noise
Received: 2022/01/29 | Accepted: 2023/09/10 | Published: 2023/12/31
Received: 2022/01/29 | Accepted: 2023/09/10 | Published: 2023/12/31
References
1. Get persistent links for your reference list or bibliography.
Copy and paste the list, we’ll match with our metadata and return the links.
Members may also deposit reference lists here too.
1. Ding T, Yan A, Liu K. What is noise-induced hearing loss? British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2019;80(9):525-9. [DOI:10.12968/hmed.2019.80.9.525]
2. Agarwal G, Nagpure PS, Gadge SV. Noise induced hearing loss in steel factory workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2014;4(2):34-43. [DOI:10.3126/ijosh.v4i2.12544]
3. Chen K-H, Su S-B, Chen K-T. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environmental health and preventive medicine. 2020;25:1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s12199-020-00906-0]
4. Basner M. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health: An ICBEN perspective. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2015;137(4):2246-. [DOI:10.1121/1.4920192]
5. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X]
6. Nakashima A. Comparison of different types of hearing protection devices for use during weapons firing. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health. 2015;1(2):43-51. [DOI:10.3138/jmvfh.3076]
7. Kuo S, Chen Y-R, Chang C-Y, Lai C-W. Development and Evaluation of Light-Weight Active Noise Cancellation Earphones. Applied Sciences. 2018;8(7):1178. [DOI:10.3390/app8071178]
8. Khalesi N, Khosravi N, Ranjbar A, Godarzi Z, Karimi A. The effectiveness of earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral stability in preterm infants. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2017;98:43-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.028]
9. Du Y, Homma K. Performance of a dual-cup-dual-cushion earmuff design. Noise Control Engineering Journal. 2009;57(5):459-75. [DOI:10.3397/1.3207866]
10. Boyer S, Doutres O, Sgard F, Laville F, Boutin J. Objective assessment of the sound paths through earmuff components. Applied acoustics. 2014;83:76-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.03.017]
11. Zaman A, Huang F, Jiang M, Wei W, Zhou Z. Preparation, properties, and applications of natural cellulosic aerogels: a review. Energy and Built Environment. 2020;1(1):60-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbenv.2019.09.002]
12. Korkmaz S, Kariper İA. Aerogel based nanogenerators: Production methods, characterizations and applications. International Journal of Energy Research. 2020;44(14):11088-110. [DOI:10.1002/er.5694]
13. Mazrouei-Sebdani Z, Begum H, Schoenwald S, Horoshenkov KV, Malfait WJ. A review on silica aerogel-based materials for acoustic applications. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2021;562:120770. [DOI:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.120770]
14. Gonçalves W, Morthomas J, Chantrenne P, Perez M, Foray G, Martin CL. Elasticity and strength of silica aerogels: A molecular dynamics study on large volumes. Acta Materialia. 2018;145:165-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.005]
15. Moretti E, Merli F, Cuce E, Buratti C. Thermal and acoustic properties of aerogels: preliminary investigation of the influence of granule size. Energy Procedia. 2017;111:472-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.209]
16. Kozlowski E. Noise Parameters of Headsets Designed for Communication Platforms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(6):3369. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph19063369]
17. America ANSIASo. Methods for the measurement of insertion loss of hearing protection devices in continuous or impulsive noise using microphone-in-real-ear or acoustic test fixture procedures. 2010.
18. de Almeida-Agurto D, Gerges SN, Arenas JP. MIRE-IL methodology applied to measuring the noise attenuation of earmuff hearing protectors. Applied acoustics. 2011;72(7):451-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.01.009]
19. Aliabadi M, Biabani A, Golmohammadi R, Farhadian M. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method. Work. 2018;60(2):271-9. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-182726]
20. Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Harris DA, Johnson JL, Shaw PB. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance. AIHA Journal. 2003;64(4):501-9. [DOI:10.1080/15428110308984846]
21. Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha‐Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise‐induced hearing loss. American journal of industrial medicine. 2005;48(6):446-58. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.20223]
22. Cheremisinoff NP. Noise control in industry: A practical guide: Elsevier; 1996.
23. Rawool VW. Hearing conservation: In occupational, recreational, educational, and home settings. (No Title). 2012. [DOI:10.1055/b-006-161069]
24. Williams R. Hearing Protectors: Don't Rely On Labeled NRRs For Performance. Retrieved from TK GROUP INC. 2008.
25. Zera J, Mlynski R, editors. Determination of earmuff transmittance with the use of MIRE technique and with artificial test fixtures. 20th International Congress on Acoustics ICA; 2010.
26. Royster L, Berger E, Royster J. Noise surveys and data analysis. The noise manual. 2003;5:165-244. [DOI:10.3320/978-1-931504-02-7.165]
27. Abel SM, Sass-Kortsak A, Kielar A. The effect on earmuff attenuation of other safety gear worn in combination. Noise and Health. 2002;5(17):1.
28. Hsu Y-L, Huang C-C, Yo C-Y, Chen C-J, Lien C-M. Comfort evaluation of hearing protection. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2004;33(6):543-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2004.01.001]
29. Patton E. Ergonomic hearing protectors. Ergonomics in Design. 2000;8(4):25-8. [DOI:10.1177/106480460000800405]
30. Bernier A, Voix J, editors. An active hearing protection device for musicians. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013; 2013: ASA. [DOI:10.1121/1.4800066]
31. Rabinowitz PM. Noise-induced hearing loss. American family physician. 2000;61(9):2759-60.
32. Arezes P, Miguel AS. Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2002;46(6):531-6.
33. Davis RR. What do we know about hearing protector comfort? Noise and Health. 2008;10(40):83. [DOI:10.4103/1463-1741.44346]
34. Ahmadi S, Nassiri P, Ghasemi I, Ep MRM. Acoustic performance of 3D printed nanocomposite earmuff. Global journal of health science. 2016;8(1):180. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n1p180]
35. Shaeri J, Yaghoubi M, Aliabadi M, Vakilinazhad R. Analysis of using nano aerogel glazing on solar heat gain and cooling load in an office at hot and dry, hot and humid and cold climates of Iran. Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics. 2017;7(4):209-21.
36. Koebel M, Rigacci A, Achard P. Aerogel-based thermal superinsulation: an overview. Journal of sol-gel science and technology. 2012;63:315-39. [DOI:10.1007/s10971-012-2792-9]
37. Wulf-Andresen P, Rasmussen P, editors. Standardized acoustic test fixtures for testing ear protection devices and noise cancelling headsets. Euro Noise; 2015.
38. E-09: A. Standard test method for measurement of normal incident sound transmission of acoustical materials based on the transfer matrix method. 2009.
39. Pääkkönen R, Lehtomäki K, Savolainen S, Myllyniemi J, Hämäläinen E. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise. Military medicine. 2000;165(9):678-82. [DOI:10.1093/milmed/165.9.678]
40. Ghavamabadi LI, Dehaghi BF, Hesampour M, Angali KA. Application of a TiO2 nanocomposite in earplugs: a case study of noise reduction. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2018.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
